Home / Case studies / B2B SaaS · Supply chain
Case study · AI visibility and SEO

Leapfrogging the category leaders in AI search.

GoFreight had an extensive content library, but much of it addressed a broad supply chain audience instead of its ideal customers, freight forwarders. We mined its CRM and sales-call data to refocus the site on the buyers who matter, and protected its search equity through three site migrations. GoFreight became the brand AI assistants name first among the eight vendors tracked, ahead of rivals with greater market share and brand awareness.

5th → 1stof 8 tracked vendors in AI buying answers
+241%Google clicks from the low point when the engagement began
+632%monthly visits referred by AI assistants since the engagement began
Exhibit 1 · Google clicks and impressions across the engagementDaily · Nov LY to Sep CY
Line chart of GoFreight's daily Google clicks and impressions across the engagement, both trending upward, with clicks rising most sharply in the later months
Blue: clicks. Purple: impressions. Axis values removed.Source: Google Search Console, www and root domain combined
The challenge

Plenty of website traffic, too few real buyers

Traffic only matters if the readers could become customers. A page written for everyone in logistics ranks for searches made by people who will never buy forwarding software.

01The site had

A large library of articles and a glossary, heavy on keywords and aimed at several audiences at once.

02What we found

CRM and sales calls showed four buyer segments, from growing forwarders replacing spreadsheets to enterprises leaving legacy platforms. Each asked different questions. Few pages spoke to any of them.

03The real gap

A site rebuild was underway. The older pages carried search history that new pages would take months to earn.

What we changed

SEO and AEO interventions

We did not chase high-volume logistics keywords that bring readers outside the buyer profile. We did not delete the old pages: their search history was redirected into the new structure.

01

Protected search equity through the rebuild

How we did it

When GoFreight rebuilt its website, years of older pages were set to disappear, and the Google rankings they had earned would have gone with them. We pointed each old page to its closest new equivalent so that search value carried over, and gathered scattered definition articles into one glossary that Google and AI assistants now draw on as a reference. When the help centre moved to a new platform, we found technical faults that were sending Google's crawlers into dead ends, and GoFreight's team fixed them to our specification.

Tactics
Site migration SEO301 redirect mappingContent consolidationMigration QA
Impact 20%
of GoFreight's AI Overview impressions now come from the 118-entry glossary
Source: Google Search Console
02

Rebuilt the content structure around four buyer segments

How we did it

The starting point was who actually buys. We studied GoFreight's CRM, recordings of its sales calls and the deals it had won, and found four distinct kinds of buyer, each with its own reasons for switching software. We then reorganised the site so each buyer finds the right page at every step: product pages to evaluate, comparison pages to shortlist, and a glossary for the basics.

Tactics
ICP modellingJobs-to-be-doneSearch intent mappingInformation architecture
03

Aligned the brand entity with GoFreight's growth strategy

How we did it

We deployed our AI intelligence system across GoFreight's on-page and off-page footprint (its own site, review sites, forums and AI answers) to map how the brand is perceived and discussed against where the company intends to go. From that gap we built a narrative strategy with a GEO lens, deciding which claims to reinforce and which contradictions to correct, then published content that gives AI engines the version of GoFreight its strategy calls for. The pages that already win its core customers were left untouched.

Tactics
Entity SEOOnsite/offsite consistency auditReview-platform signalsContent gap analysis
Results across the engagement
18.8 → 8.2average Google position since the engagement began
6.2% → 35.0%of tracked ChatGPT answers naming GoFreight
Exhibit 2 · Share of AI answers naming GoFreight, by engine
Line chart of the weekly share of AI answers naming GoFreight on Google AI Overview, Perplexity and ChatGPT, rising on all three engines
Weekly, across 28 non-brand prompts covering the top, middle and bottom of the buying funnel.Source: Novastacks AI answer tracking
Exhibit 3 · Sessions referred by AI assistants
Area chart of weekly website sessions referred by AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Copilot, trending upward over the engagement
Weekly, from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot and other assistants. Axis values removed.Source: GA4

These results reflect the combined engagement, including changes implemented by GoFreight's team.

Sources and periods (LY = last year, CY = current year): Google Search Console, www and root domain combined (clicks Nov LY to Aug CY; position Nov LY to Sep CY); GA4 (AI-referred visits Nov LY to Sep CY); Novastacks AI answer tracking across a fixed set of buying prompts (Jan to Sep CY).

The lesson

Content written for every audience ranks for queries no buyer types. Start from who signs the contract, map the jobs they need done, then build the site around them.

See which buying questions your brand is missing from

Get a free AI visibility auditTalk to us