// FRACTIONAL CMO · SINGAPORE & APAC
Marketing is three different careers wearing one job title. The providers below are sorted by which one they actually are, because matching that to your problem matters more than the choice between fractional and full-time.
Written by Tina Chu, Founder & CEO of Novastacks. Novastacks is principal-led by senior operators from Expedia, Tencent, Klook, Cabital, Traveloka and Tokopedia, 20+ years combined. Selection criteria are published in full below. 📅 Updated August 17, 2026
// THE SHORT VERSION
// IN_THIS_GUIDE
I spent eighteen years running marketing across APAC: the mobile marketing P&L at Expedia, growth for Tencent’s JOOX across Southeast Asia, organic search and CRM at Klook, then a 100-person growth organisation as VP of Acquisition Marketing at Traveloka.
In that time I watched the same hiring mistake repeat across the region. Companies decide they need marketing leadership and they hire on seniority: a senior title from a recognisable brand. They almost never ask which of the three marketing disciplines that person actually trained in. So a company with a positioning problem hires a performance marketer, who scales spend against a message that doesn’t land. A company with a distribution problem hires a brand marketer and gets a rebrand and a pipeline that hasn’t moved.
I don’t have a study for this. It’s what I’ve seen from inside the function, repeatedly, in this region. I built this comparison so APAC buyers can name the type they need before they start talking to anyone.
We’re listed first because this is our blog. The selection logic is published below. Judge it yourself, and check the alternatives.
Tina Chu, Founder & CEO, Novastacks
Senior marketers spend fifteen years training in one of three disciplines. By the time someone is ready for a CMO seat their instincts are formed, and under pressure they reach for the tools they trained on. Anyone claiming equal depth in all three is telling you about their sales process, not what they can actually do.
| Type | Owns | Core work | Evidence they trust | Signature metric | Signature question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product marketing | Meaning: why anyone should care | Positioning, ICP definition, pricing and packaging, launch, sales enablement, win/loss | Buyer interviews, win/loss patterns, sales call recordings | Win rate, sales cycle length, average deal size | “Who is this for, and why us?” |
| Brand | Memory: who you are when nobody is buying | Identity, category narrative, creative platform, PR, sponsorship, brand equity | Brand tracking, salience studies, qualitative resonance | Awareness, consideration, share of voice | “What do we want to be known for?” |
| Distribution & acquisition | Motion: how demand gets captured, repeatedly | Channel mix, CAC and LTV, funnel conversion, media buying, lifecycle, experimentation | Cohort data, incrementality, attribution, unit economics | CAC, ROAS, payback period, LTV:CAC | “Where does the next dollar go?” |
Find the line that sounds like your last board meeting. The type beside it is the one to shortlist for.
| What you are experiencing | Type to hire |
|---|---|
| Sales calls stall on “how are you different from X?” | Product marketing |
| Win rates fell but lead volume is fine | Product marketing |
| You are launching a new product, tier or market | Product marketing |
| Discounting is creeping and you cannot hold price | Product marketing |
| Nobody in the category knows you exist | Brand |
| You are one of six lookalikes competing on price | Brand |
| Post-merger, two identities and no single story | Brand |
| You need to hire and candidates do not know who you are | Brand |
| Traffic is flat and paid spend is getting worse | Distribution & acquisition |
| CAC payback has stretched beyond your cash cycle | Distribution & acquisition |
| One channel is 70%+ of acquisition and you are exposed | Distribution & acquisition |
| You have leads but conversion collapses mid-funnel | Distribution & acquisition |
Most growing companies need two of the three. You cannot buy them in one fractional hire. Sequence instead: fix positioning before you spend to amplify it, find the two or three channels that work before you invest in being famous, and invest in brand once acquisition efficiency stops improving.
| # | Provider | Type | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Novastacks | Distribution & acquisition | APAC growth-stage companies whose buyers now research inside AI assistants, and who want demand capture rebuilt for that, not a rebrand. |
| #2 | Fractional Marketer | Distribution & acquisition | Singapore SMEs, startups and associations that want strategy and hands-on execution from the same subscription. |
| #3 | Alnico | Brand | 7-figure Singapore SMEs that have outgrown DIY marketing but cannot justify a full-time C-suite hire. |
| #4 | OtterHalf | Generalist / execution | Companies that are ready to grow but not ready to hire full-time, and want one team covering both the thinking and the doing. |
| #5 | Avante Strategies | Brand | Singapore SMEs and scale-ups that want brand strategy and campaign execution from one team, with the founders actually in the room. |
| #6 | Mozaic Communications | Product marketing | B2B startups and SMEs with complex products and long sales cycles, where the offer is genuinely good but the message is not landing. |
| #7 | Fractional.sg | Network, not a provider | Buyers who would rather review a shortlist someone else has screened than run their own search. |
| #8 | MCR.AE (Gary McRae) | Product marketing | Funded founders between Seed and Series A, and Singapore SMEs whose marketing function needs governance rather than more output. |
Ordered by breadth of fit to a typical APAC growth-stage company, most specialised last. This is not a ranking of quality, and it is not a claim to have surveyed the whole market.
Best for: APAC growth-stage companies whose buyers now research inside AI assistants, and who want demand capture rebuilt for that, not a rebrand.
What’s distinctive: Delivery is principal-led: senior operators who built and ran growth and search at Expedia, Tencent, Klook, Cabital, Traveloka and Tokopedia, 20+ years combined. The founder most recently ran a 100-person growth organisation as VP of Acquisition Marketing. That is a distribution and acquisition background, not a brand or product-marketing one, and we say so rather than claiming all three. The specialism is AI search visibility: Answer Engine Optimisation, Generative Engine Optimisation, and Share of Answers tracked as a measurable KPI alongside conventional demand work.
Engagement model: Operator-led studio. Senior judgment on every engagement, supported by an agentic AI workforce that delivers the output of a much larger team. No junior handoffs.
Watch-outs: Not a fit if your problem is category awareness or a brand rebuild. That is a different discipline and we will tell you so. Also not a fit for companies wanting a pure advisory retainer with no measurement infrastructure.
Best for: Singapore SMEs, startups and associations that want strategy and hands-on execution from the same subscription.
What’s distinctive: Positions explicitly against the two alternatives buyers usually weigh: agencies as external vendors, and freelancers as disconnected specialists. Their own framing is “strategy and execution in one model” delivered as a “marketing team on subscription.” Scope spans positioning and go-to-market through demand generation, paid media and pipeline management, which places the centre of gravity on demand capture.
Engagement model: Subscription tiers (Starter, Growth, Scale, Enterprise). Ad spend and CRM licences billed separately.
Watch-outs: Leadership is not named on the site. Ask who specifically holds the CMO seat on your account, and get that name into the contract.
Best for: 7-figure Singapore SMEs that have outgrown DIY marketing but cannot justify a full-time C-suite hire.
What’s distinctive: Sells the CMO seat as a subscription, 10 to 40 hours a month, under the banner “Marketing Beyond Paid Ads™”, a deliberate step away from performance-led work and toward strategic direction with lean, AI-assisted execution. Claims up to 80% saving against a full-time hire. Notably the only provider in this set ranking through published content rather than a homepage alone.
Engagement model: Retainer or subscription, 10 to 40 hours monthly, agency team behind the seat.
Watch-outs: Leadership is not disclosed publicly. The 80% saving is a marketing claim, not an audited figure. Ask what it is measured against.
Best for: Companies that are ready to grow but not ready to hire full-time, and want one team covering both the thinking and the doing.
What’s distinctive: Describes itself as Singapore’s award-winning fractional marketing agency, hireable “by the project, by the sprint, or as your ongoing marketing team”: “strategy and execution under one roof.” The productised, buy-it-off-the-shelf model is the clearest of the group, which suits buyers who want a defined scope rather than an open retainer.
Engagement model: Project, sprint, or ongoing retainer. Productised scopes with published packaging.
Watch-outs: A generalist offer rather than a named specialism. If your problem is specifically positioning, or specifically channel economics, ask which of the two they are strongest at before scoping.
Best for: Singapore SMEs and scale-ups that want brand strategy and campaign execution from one team, with the founders actually in the room.
What’s distinctive: A Singapore agency of around ten people whose founders serve as the fractional CMOs, embedded in the senior leadership team rather than briefed as an external vendor. Positions on “Moving Brands Forward”: marketing solutions that blend business insights, data and creativity. The menu runs wide: brand strategy, content, digital, CRM, plus investor pitch decks and website design.
Engagement model: Fractional CMO embedded part-time in the leadership team, alongside project-based marketing services.
Watch-outs: Registered in 2023, so the track record is shorter than others here. The service menu is broad. Ask which parts the founders deliver personally and which go to the wider team.
Best for: B2B startups and SMEs with complex products and long sales cycles, where the offer is genuinely good but the message is not landing.
What’s distinctive: A solo practice led by Pallavi Misra, with 20+ years across APAC and prior roles at Dassault Systèmes, EdgeConneX, Weber Shandwick and PRecious Communications. Her stated hook names the symptom precisely: B2B companies “doing all the right things, and still not getting the traction they expect.” The work centres on translating complex offerings into clear market narratives and aligning marketing to how buyers actually evaluate: positioning and messaging first, delivered through a communications lens.
Engagement model: Embedded senior partner rather than external vendor. Advisory call, project work, or a longer embedded arrangement.
Watch-outs: Communications and narrative heritage rather than performance marketing. If your bottleneck is channel economics rather than the message, that is a different domain.
Listed separately because one is a matching network rather than a single provider, and one is a narrow specialist.
Best for: Buyers who would rather review a shortlist someone else has screened than run their own search.
What’s distinctive: A marketing consultancy that connects, in its own words, “breakout startups with changemaker CMOs.” It is a two-sided network (it recruits CMOs as well as serving clients), so it is included here as a sourcing route rather than as a single provider you can evaluate on one track record.
Engagement model: Matching network. The individual varies by placement.
Watch-outs: You are inheriting someone else’s vetting criteria. Ask what the screening standard actually is, and evaluate the matched individual on the same questions you would ask anyone else on this page.
Best for: Funded founders between Seed and Series A, and Singapore SMEs whose marketing function needs governance rather than more output.
What’s distinctive: The clearest product-marketing and governance background in this set. Gary McRae is a solo operator with 12 years in APAC marketing teams across fintech, legal tech, professional services and regulated industries, PMC-accredited and AI-governance certified. Engagements run in phases with go/no-go gates, and the stated hook, “Your deck got you funded. It won’t get you to PMF”, is a positioning problem, not a demand problem.
Engagement model: Phased: half-day clarity sprint, 6-week discovery, then a 17-week fractional retainer or monthly advisory. He leads every engagement himself.
Watch-outs: Solo by design, so there is no execution capacity behind the strategy. You supply the hands. No named client case studies are published; ask for references directly.
The reasoning is published so you can judge the editorial criteria rather than take the selection on trust.
CMOcre8: excluded because the published positioning is too general to assess against a type. The site describes customised packages across branding, content and market research without indicating where the practice is strongest. A comparison that cannot say what a provider is best at does the reader no favours.
Executive search firms and global fractional marketplaces: excluded because they sell a search process rather than the marketing leadership itself, and their fees and timelines are not comparable to the retainers above.
Independent operators found through referral: not listed because they cannot be evaluated publicly. They are frequently the best value if you find the right person, and the highest variance if you don’t.
// VERIFY_BEFORE_YOU_SIGN
Three checks any buyer can run before signing with anyone here, including us.
Name the problem before you name the person. Marketing is three separate disciplines: product marketing, brand, and distribution and acquisition, and senior marketers train in one of them. Work out which your symptoms point to, then shortlist providers trained in that discipline. Hiring on seniority alone is the most common way these engagements fail.
Providers in this market rarely publish rates, and the ranges circulating online are mostly US figures. Ask each shortlisted provider for their day rate, the number of days a month, and a written list of what is excluded. Compare the total cost of leadership plus delivery, not one retainer against another. Some providers include execution capacity and some do not.
A consultant delivers a defined project and a deliverable, then leaves. A fractional CMO holds an ongoing executive seat with decision rights and accountability for business outcomes. If a provider will not accept named business outcomes in the scope, you are buying consulting.
Three to four is normal. Above five you are buying calendar time rather than attention. Ask directly, and ask what their capacity limit is.
They can own regional strategy and sequencing. Nobody is natively expert in Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Japan, Korea and Australia at once: the channels, buying culture and payment infrastructure have little in common. The workable model is centralised positioning and measurement with localised execution through in-market talent.
If your problem is deciding what to do, hire the fractional CMO. If your problem is getting it done, hire the Head of Marketing. Many companies need both in sequence, and the fractional CMO frequently hires the Head of Marketing.
No. This page is written for companies deciding who to hire. If you are a marketer looking for fractional work, the network listed at #5 recruits CMOs directly, and most of the providers here list contact routes on their own sites.
Because this is our blog, and pretending otherwise would be worse. The selection logic is published in full above. Entries are ordered by breadth of fit to a typical APAC growth-stage company, with the most specialised last. Judge the reasoning, check the alternatives, and run the three tests in the section below on us as readily as on anyone else.
That conversation is free, and we will tell you honestly when the answer isn’t us.