Aktivo Labs AEO Assessment Report
by Novastacks AI
aktivolabs.com | Singapore Market
March 02, 2026 | Prepared by Novastacks AI
Site Readiness: 2.6 · LLM Visibility: 1.8
Aktivo Has the Science, the Clients, and the Funding — But Zero AI Presence Where Buyers Are Looking
Aktivo Labs has $10M in Series A funding, enterprise clients including AXA and Dai-ichi, a patented chronic disease biomarker, and HIPAA certification. Their website generates fewer than 25 monthly visitors from organic search in Singapore. Seven keywords rank — the top one is their CEO's name. There is not a single product-category keyword in the top 50.
The business impact is measurable: when insurance company buyers ask AI models "what are the best health engagement platforms for insurers in Asia?" — the exact audience Aktivo serves — ChatGPT recommends dacadoo, Pulse by Prudential, and CareVoice. Aktivo doesn't appear. When HR decision-makers search for "best digital health platforms for employee wellness in Singapore," twelve platforms are recommended. Aktivo is not among them. Intellect is. Doctor Anywhere is. Aktivo isn't. The platform has established market credibility through conference appearances, institutional partnerships, and a published case study with IFHP — but none of that authority is translating into AI citations. Their competitor dacadoo, which offers a directly competing health score product, is being surfaced instead across both ChatGPT and category-level queries. Aktivo is winning deals in back-channels while losing the AI-first discovery layer entirely.
| Domain | Ranked Keywords | Est. Traffic (ETV) | #1 Positions | #2-3 | #4-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aktivolabs.com | 7 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| intellect.co | 337 | 1,662 | 8 | 4 | 49 |
| doctoranywhere.com | 1,975 | 26,252 | 60 | 105 | 403 |
1 Ranked Keywords — Total keywords for which the domain has any position (1–100) in Google Singapore SERPs. Source: DataForSEO Labs, March 2026.
2 ETV — Estimated Traffic Value: projected monthly organic search visits based on keyword positions and search volumes. Source: DataForSEO Labs, March 2026.
3 Position data reflects Google Singapore (location_code: 2702), English language. Aktivo's 7 ranked keywords include CEO's name, company aliases, and generic terms — zero product-category terms.
AI Category Invisibility
0/4category queries where Aktivo is recommended
When buyers ask AI models for health engagement platforms for insurers or digital health platforms in Singapore, Aktivo doesn't appear in any response — despite being purpose-built for exactly these use cases. Competitors dacadoo, CareVoice, and Intellect are recommended instead. Our AEO solution addresses this by building AI-citation authority across the specific query types your buyers use.
§ Section 02: AI Visibility
Blog Content Invisible to AI
9+ postsblog articles AI crawlers cannot read
Aktivo's News & Insights section contains valuable thought leadership — but the entire blog is rendered via JavaScript (Angular CSR). AI crawlers see an empty HTML shell. Every article, every case study, every insight published is invisible to the AI models your buyers consult. Our AEO solution addresses this by ensuring all content is accessible and structured for AI extraction.
§ Section 04: Infrastructure
Zero Third-Party Citation Surface
0listings on G2, Capterra, or review platforms
AI models cite platforms with strong third-party review ecosystems. Aktivo has no G2 listing, no Capterra profile, no Trustpilot presence, and a YouTube channel with 36 subscribers. ChatGPT builds its category recommendations primarily from review platforms and third-party coverage — sources where Aktivo simply doesn't exist. Our AEO solution addresses this by systematically building the citation surfaces AI models draw from.
§ Section 06: Brand Authority
This assessment analyzes the top 150 ranked keywords per domain across 3 sites, crawls 9–15 representative pages per audit, runs 3 Lighthouse performance audits, and executes 12 AI prompt tests across ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews. Third-party citation surface checks include YouTube, Reddit, G2, Wikipedia, direct competitor domains, and other category-relevant platforms. All scores use a 1–10 scale. Data reflects conditions as of March 2026.
ChatGPT Knows Aktivo — But Recommends dacadoo to Your Buyers
AI visibility across ChatGPT and Google AI Overview for branded and category queries
ChatGPT Query Results
| Prompt Type | Query | Mentioned? | Who Was Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branded | Tell me about Aktivo Labs — what do they do? | Yes | Aktivo cited 10+ times; aktivolabs.com, web.aktivolabs.com, LinkedIn, startup-seeker.com cited |
| Competitor Branded | Tell me about Intellect — the mental health platform for enterprises | No | Intellect described from training data; Aktivo not mentioned |
| Category | Best digital health platforms for employee wellness in Singapore | No | 12 platforms listed: MantraCare, WellSync, CERRA, iAPPS, Intellect, Safe Space, ThoughtFull, Holmusk, Doctor Anywhere, Banao, GenixPRO, Imagene Labs. Aktivo absent. |
| Category | Best health engagement platforms for insurance companies in Asia | No | CareVoice, CoverGo, ManulifeMOVE, Plum, Dialogue, MyDoc, Ping An cited. Aktivo absent. dacadoo cited as direct competitor. |
| Comparison | Aktivo Labs vs Intellect vs Doctor Anywhere — enterprise health platforms | Yes | Aktivo mentioned 1st (alphabetical). Generic description from training data only. No web search used, no citations. |
| Long-tail / Transactional | Health engagement platform for insurers — what are the best in Southeast Asia? | No | GOQii, Pulse by Prudential, FitSense, dacadoo cited as top platforms. Aktivo absent. |
ChatGPT has strong brand recognition of Aktivo Labs — it can describe the company, its products, and its clients accurately in a branded query. But this recognition doesn't transfer to category queries. When buyers ask who they should buy from, ChatGPT draws on review platforms, third-party directories, and editorial coverage to build its list. Aktivo has none of those. The result: accurate brand knowledge but zero commercial recommendation presence. Notably, dacadoo — a direct competitor offering a health score product — was cited as a top platform in two separate insurance category queries.
Google AI Overview Results
| Query Type | Query | AIO Triggered? | Prospect Rank | Top Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | best digital health platform Singapore chronic disease prevention | Yes | Not present | DigitalHealth.sg (#1), SingHealth (#2), CADENCE (#3), HealthHub (#4), MOH (#5) |
| Branded | Aktivo Labs digital health | No | #1 (own domain) | aktivolabs.com dominates top 3 results |
Google AI Overview triggers for category-level chronic disease prevention queries — the exact strategic territory Aktivo occupies. These AI Overviews cite government health bodies (SingHealth, MOH, HealthHub) and clinical platforms. Aktivo doesn't appear. For branded searches, Aktivo ranks #1 across their own domain, indicating no technical crawl blocks. The gap is entirely content and authority, not access.
Citation Surface Analysis
| Platform | Presence | Strength | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | Minimal | 36 subscribers, 2 own videos | CEO features in 3rd-party conference videos (ITC DIA, Hannover Re); no owned channel authority |
| None | 0 threads | No brand mentions found on Reddit | |
| Yes | 3,200+ followers | Active company page; conference updates posted regularly | |
| G2 | None | No listing | Competitors like MantraCare and Intellect have G2 profiles cited by ChatGPT |
| Capterra | None | No listing | Zero review platform presence across all major directories |
Aktivo's strongest platform footprint is LinkedIn (3,200+ followers) — but LinkedIn is rarely cited by AI models for commercial recommendations. YouTube presence is negligible: 36 subscribers, 2 company videos with under 250 views each. Third-party conference videos (ITC DIA, Hannover Re, DigFin) do feature the CEO, which provides some credibility signals, but these are insufficient to drive AI citation in category queries. The complete absence from G2, Capterra, and review aggregators is the single biggest AI citation gap — these are the sources ChatGPT draws on to build 'best of' lists.
A 4-Page Marketing Site Competing Against Platforms with Hundreds of Indexed Pages
Page-type coverage comparison across Aktivo Labs, Intellect, and Doctor Anywhere
| Page Type | Aktivo Labs | intellect.co | doctoranywhere.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage | ✓ WordPress SSR | ✓ WordPress SSR | ✓ WordPress SSR |
| Product/Feature Pages | ⚠ Minimal (1-2 pages) | ✓ 7 solution pages | ✓ 20+ service pages |
| Blog/Informational | ✗ CSR — AI cannot read | ✓ Articles + Case Studies | ✓ Health Library blog |
| FAQ/Help | ✗ Does not exist | ✗ Does not exist | ✗ Does not exist |
| Case Studies / Proof | ⚠ External PDF only (IFHP) | ✓ Case studies section | ⚠ Blog posts only |
| Schema Markup | ⚠ Basic (Org + WebSite only) | ⚠ Org + Video schema | ⚠ Basic (no Org schema) |
The Blog That AI Can't Read: Angular CSR Is Locking Out Your Content Library
Infrastructure issues suppressing AI crawlability and search visibility
Blog Page Uses Angular CSR — AI Crawlers See Empty Content
CriticalThe News & Insights section (aktivolabs.com/news-and-insights/) is rendered by Angular JavaScript on the client side. When an AI crawler like GPTBot or ClaudeBot fetches this URL, they receive the raw HTML shell — zero blog post content, zero article text, zero titles. The page analysis confirms: H1 count = 0, H2 count = 1 (only the footer contact form). Despite 9+ published articles, the entire content library is invisible to AI systems. This isn't a crawl block — robots.txt permits all bots — it's an architectural issue where content only materializes after JavaScript executes, which AI crawlers don't do.
Business impact: Every thought leadership piece, every case study, every product update published on this blog has zero chance of being cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overview. The investment in content production generates no AI citation return.
Homepage Has 2 H2 Tags — Structural Content Signals Are Near-Zero
CriticalThe homepage contains 1 H1, 2 H2 headings (both footer-level: 'and Innovation' and 'Contact Aktivo®'), and 43,314 characters of text — but the text is mostly navigation, footer, and script content. The main body content is sparse and unstructured. AI models extract content from heading hierarchies; with only 2 H2s on the homepage, there are almost no structured content signals for AI to parse and quote. By comparison, Intellect's homepage has 10 H1 equivalents and 10 H3 sections across 78,904 characters of structured content.
Missing FAQPage, Article, and SoftwareApplication Schema
HighThe homepage implements Organization, WebSite, WebPage, and BreadcrumbList schema — a basic but incomplete implementation. Critical missing schemas for a B2B SaaS health platform: FAQPage (enables FAQ rich results and AI extraction of Q&A pairs), Article/BlogPosting (signals to AI that pages contain citable information), SoftwareApplication (categorizes the product type for AI systems), and Product schema for individual modules (Aktivo Score, Aktivo Mind, Glucolife). The blog page has CollectionPage schema but no individual Article schemas — confirming the AI crawlability gap even at the metadata level.
Website Split Across Two Domains (aktivolabs.com vs web.aktivolabs.com)
HighAktivo operates across two separate domains: aktivolabs.com (marketing site) and web.aktivolabs.com (appears to host additional content including some blog articles). This domain split fragments link authority and AI citation signals. ChatGPT cited web.aktivolabs.com/news-and-insights/ for at least one article. Google SERPs show web.aktivolabs.com at position 9 for 'digital health platform Singapore.' This split means neither domain accumulates the full weight of backlinks, citations, and indexed content — effectively halving the authority that should be concentrating on a single domain.
9 Blog Posts, Zero AI Citations: The Content Exists But Is Architecturally Invisible
Content depth and format gaps vs. AI citation standards
No FAQ Content Anywhere on the Site
CriticalAktivo has no FAQ page, no FAQ section, and no question-format headings across any crawled page. FAQ content is one of the highest-ROI formats for AI citation: AI models actively extract Q&A pairs to answer user queries. Questions like 'What is the Aktivo Score?', 'How does Aktivo integrate with wearables?', 'What chronic diseases does Aktivo target?' — none of these are answered in an extractable format. A single well-structured FAQ page targeting buyer-intent questions could immediately create AI citation opportunities that currently don't exist.
Blog Content Is Topically Unfocused for AI Citation
HighOf the 9 visible blog posts, topics include: a tech stack engineering post, a geographic expansion story, an app launch in India for a specific brand (Britannia NutriChoice), and a conference appearance update. None of these are structured to answer the category-level questions that AI models field from buyers. Posts like 'What is population health management?', 'How do insurance companies use health engagement platforms?', or 'Chronic disease prevention: what works at population scale?' — the content that would earn Aktivo citations in the queries where they're currently absent — don't exist. The blog reads as a company news feed, not an AI citation asset.
Case Study Data Lives in External PDF, Not Indexed Pages
HighAktivo's most compelling proof — a published case study with Dai-ichi Vietnam through IFHP (International Federation of Health Plans) — lives as a PDF on ifhp.com. The case study appears in Google SERP results for branded queries (position 5), but the content benefits the IFHP domain, not aktivolabs.com. This is a missed citation opportunity: if this case study content were published as a structured page on aktivolabs.com with proper schema, it would build authority directly on their domain. Instead, a third-party organization gets the domain credit.
No Comparison or 'Best Of' Content Positioning Aktivo in the Market
HighChatGPT's category recommendations are built largely from 'best of' editorial content and review listings. Aktivo has published nothing that positions them within the competitive landscape — no 'Aktivo vs dacadoo' comparison, no 'How to choose a health engagement platform for your insurer' guide, no 'Top chronic disease prevention platforms' list where they appear. The competitor dacadoo — which appeared in 2 of 4 ChatGPT category queries — likely benefits from exactly this type of content published either by dacadoo or third-party review sites. Aktivo is absent from this content category entirely.
dacadoo Gets the AI Recommendation While Aktivo Gets the Conference Badge
Brand positioning gaps in AI-mediated discovery
A Direct Competitor (dacadoo) Is Being Recommended in Aktivo's Core Market
Criticaldacadoo — which offers a directly competing Health Score product for insurance companies — was cited by ChatGPT in two separate insurance-category queries as a top health engagement platform for insurers in Southeast Asia. Aktivo's Aktivo Score® is functionally equivalent to dacadoo's Health Score, yet ChatGPT recommends dacadoo and ignores Aktivo. This is not a technology gap — it's a content authority and citation surface gap. dacadoo has a G2 listing, published comparison content, and editorial coverage that positions them in exactly the queries Aktivo should own.
Brand Known at the Individual Level, Not the Category Level
HighChatGPT's branded query response demonstrates strong factual accuracy about Aktivo: it correctly describes the Aktivo Score, mentions Marsh Mercer, AXA, Sun Life, Dai-ichi as clients, and cites specific funding details ($10M Series A, Mitsui, SEEDS Capital). This indicates Aktivo has sufficient third-party media coverage for brand awareness in AI training data. The problem is that this brand knowledge doesn't surface when categories are queried — because Aktivo hasn't published the content that connects their brand to the category-level terms buyers use. They're known as 'Aktivo Labs' but invisible as 'health engagement platform for insurers.'
LinkedIn Is the Only Active Citation Surface — and AI Doesn't Cite It
HighAktivo's LinkedIn page (3,200+ followers) is their strongest active digital presence outside the website. But LinkedIn is not a platform AI models cite for commercial recommendations. ChatGPT cited LinkedIn in Aktivo's branded query as a source of company news — not as a product recommendation source. YouTube has 36 subscribers and 2 company-produced videos with under 250 views each. The absence from G2, Capterra, Clutch, and third-party review platforms means there's no citation surface where buyers go to compare solutions — and where AI models go to source their recommendations.
Roadmap: From AI-Invisible to Category-Recommended in 6 Months
Prioritized fixes across three time horizons
Site Readiness Score
LLM Visibility Score
Horizon 1: Infrastructure (0-30 days)
+2.5 to +3.5 Site Readiness score
Migrate News & Insights blog from Angular CSR to server-side rendering (WordPress or static HTML) so AI crawlers can index all existing content
Consolidate web.aktivolabs.com content onto aktivolabs.com to unify domain authority
Add FAQPage, Article, and SoftwareApplication structured data schema to homepage and product pages
Audit and expand XML sitemap to include all product, blog, and solution pages
Verify llms.txt is in place and correctly configured
Horizon 2: Content (30-90 days)
+1.5 to +2.0 LLM Visibility (category queries)
Publish 10+ FAQ pages targeting buyer-intent queries: 'What is a health engagement platform?', 'How does the Aktivo Score work?', 'Aktivo vs dacadoo: which is right for insurers?'
Rebuild existing blog posts as properly structured SSR articles with Article schema, clear H2 hierarchy, and extractable definitions
Publish 2-3 original data reports using Aktivo's '9 million years of patient data' — these become AI-citable primary sources
Create on-site case study pages (Dai-ichi Vietnam, AXA, Old Mutual Kenya) to move proof content from external PDFs onto aktivolabs.com
Horizon 3: Authority (3-6 months)
+2.0 to +3.0 LLM Visibility (third-party review and platform citation)
Build G2, Capterra, and Clutch profiles — solicit reviews from existing enterprise clients to generate citation-worthy review content
Pitch Aktivo for editorial coverage in insurance and digital health trade publications that ChatGPT and Perplexity source from (InsuranceBusiness, Digital Health Today, IFHP)
Develop comparison content positioning Aktivo against dacadoo, CareVoice, and ManulifeMOVE for high-intent insurer queries
Build YouTube channel content strategy: CEO thought leadership videos on chronic disease prevention data, targeting 1K+ subscriber milestone for AI citation weight
Agentic Marketing Systems, Built by Senior Operators
Novastacks is not an agency selling AI as a buzzword. We are senior marketing operators with decades of experience at Expedia, Tencent, Klook, and Traveloka who built enterprise-grade AI marketing systems from the ground up.
What We Do
- ▸AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) — Get your brand cited when prospects ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI about your category
- ▸SEO Integration — Traditional search visibility that compounds with AI visibility
- ▸Custom AI Growth Systems — Agentic workflows, content engines, and data pipelines built for your business
- ▸Fractional Growth Partner — Senior strategic leadership without the full-time overhead
What You Get From Us
Solutions designed by operators who've led growth marketing and SEO at the Director/VP level. Not juniors following playbooks.
AI-powered workflows that move at machine speed. Audits, content, optimization, and reporting that would take a team weeks, delivered in days.
No bloated retainers. Scope of work tailored to your stage, budget, and goals. Start small, scale when you see results.
Ready to Be
Recommended by AI?
Book a 30-minute call with us. We'll walk through your full assessment — including exactly which queries your buyers are using, which competitors are being recommended instead of you, and a prioritized 90-day plan to start appearing in the AI responses that drive decisions.
Book Discovery Call30 min | Free | No commitment