GoodTake AI AEO Assessment Report
by Novastacks AI
goodtake.ai | Singapore Market
February 14, 2026 | Prepared by Novastacks AI
AI Studio Invisible to AI: Zero Content, Zero Citations, Zero Discovery
GoodTake AI launched in 2024 as an AI creative studio but is essentially invisible in both traditional search and AI platforms. With only 1 ranking keyword generating $6/month in organic value, the site has no SEO foundation. More critically for an AI-focused business: when prospects ask ChatGPT or Perplexity about AI creative studios in Singapore, GoodTake is never mentioned—competitors Dear.AI and COCO Creative Studio dominate these responses.
The site operates as a client-side React app (Vercel/Next.js) with zero schema markup, no blog, and minimal indexable content. This creates a compounding problem: AI crawlers can't extract information, search engines can't rank pages that don't exist, and there are no third-party sources citing the brand. The company has LinkedIn presence and a Crunchbase profile, but no media coverage, reviews, or content that LLMs would cite.
GoodTake doesn't appear in organic SERPs for any of their core commercial keywords: "AI creative studio Singapore", "AI video generation tools", "AI image generation production". Competitors rank in positions 1-3. This invisibility extends to AI platforms—neither ChatGPT nor Perplexity mention GoodTake when users ask about the category.
Your Singapore Market Position
Here's how you compare against your direct competitors in Singapore. We looked at your ranking keywords, traffic value, and top positions to see where you stand.
| Metric | GoodTake AI | Dear.AI / CreativesAtWork | COCO Creative Studio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keywords ranking (Singapore) | 1 | 8 | 167 |
| Est. traffic value | $6 | $63 | $615 |
| Top 10 positions | 1 | 2 | 33 |
| Position #1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Est. paid traffic cost | $0 | $16 | $1,738 |
SERP Discovery
"AI creative studio Singapore"
NOT IN TOP 20COCO Creative #1, Dear.AI #2. No AI Overview triggered.
"AI video generation tools"
NOT IN TOP 20Major players: MASV, Canva, Reddit discussions. No AI Overview.
"AI image generation production"
NOT IN TOP 20CNET, Zapier, Adobe rank top 3. No AI Overview.
Your LLM Visibility Score
0.7/10We asked ChatGPT and Perplexity the same questions your customers would ask — about your brand, your services, and how you compare to competitors. Here's how often you were mentioned.
| Query Type | ChatGPT gpt-4o | Perplexity sonar-pro | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| brandedWhat is GoodTake AI and what services do they offer? | 5/10Web | 6/10 | 5.5/10 |
| core_keywordWhat are the best AI creative studios in Singapore? | 0/10Web | 0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| comparisonCompare GoodTake AI vs COCO Creative Studio vs Dear.AI for AI video and image generation | 0/10No Web | 1/10 | 0.5/10 |
WEIGHTED LLM VISIBILITY SCORE
0.7/10
Zero Category Visibility
When prospects ask AI 'What are the best AI creative studios in Singapore?', GoodTake is absent from both ChatGPT and Perplexity responses. ChatGPT lists 11 competitors; Perplexity highlights Dear.AI and COCO Creative Studio as leaders. This is the exact query GoodTake's target customers are asking.
Brand Confusion
ChatGPT confuses GoodTake AI (goodtake.ai, creative studio) with GoodTake (goodtake.co, talent platform for casting). Both launched in 2024, both Singapore-based. This name collision dilutes brand clarity in AI responses.
No Third-Party Validation
LLMs cite media, not company sites. Dear.AI has 3+ news articles (CreativesAtWork, Taiwan News, Intelligent CIO). COCO has industry presence. GoodTake has zero media coverage—only Crunchbase + LinkedIn founder activity.
LinkedIn Presence
Founders (Mila Troncoso, Gleb Shabanov) are active on LinkedIn with company updates, Founder University participation posts. LinkedIn company page exists (50+ followers). This is a foundation to build on but needs amplification.
Your Top 3 Opportunities
in Singapore
Based on the gaps we found, these are the highest-impact moves you can make to start showing up in AI-generated recommendations for your market.
Build Content Foundation
With <30 pages of indexable content and zero blog, there's nothing for search engines or AI to rank. Competitors have FAQ pages, service descriptions, case studies. GoodTake needs: (1) Blog with 'How to use AI for [X production task]', model comparisons (Seedance vs VEO vs Nano Banana), creative workflows. (2) FAQ page with schema-marked questions about AI production, pricing models, use cases. (3) Service pages dedicated to video generation, image generation, production workflows (not just homepage). (4) Case studies/examples showing outputs, before/after, client workflows. Impact: Creates substrate for organic rankings + AI extraction. Without content, nothing else matters.
Implement Core Schema
Zero schema = zero structured signals to AI. Competitors also lack schema—first mover wins. Implement in 1-2 weeks: (1) Organization schema: name, logo, description, sameAs (LinkedIn, Twitter), contactPoint. (2) Product/SoftwareApplication schema for each AI model/service offered. (3) FAQPage schema on FAQ page (create FAQ first). Impact: Knowledge Graph eligibility, AI extraction, rich results. Low effort, high signal.
Generate Third-Party Citations
LLMs cite media, not company sites. Dear.AI has 3+ news articles; COCO has industry presence. GoodTake has zero. Options: (1) PR campaign targeting Singapore tech media (Tech in Asia, e27, Vulcan Post). Angle: 'AI studio launches with [specific model] for Singapore brands'. (2) Founder thought leadership via LinkedIn articles, guest posts on AI/production blogs, conference talks. (3) Community platforms: Reddit (r/Singapore, r/ArtificialIntelligence), ProductHunt launch, YouTube demos. (4) Review platforms: G2 (if B2B), Clutch (creative agencies), Y Combinator profile. Impact: External validation LLMs will cite. Competitors also lack this—opportunity to differentiate.
What's in the Full Report
What you've seen
- Overall AEO Score (1.2/10)
- Competitive positioning vs COCO Creative Studio & Dear.AI / CreativesAtWork
- AI visibility status across ChatGPT & Perplexity
- Top 3 opportunities in Singapore
What's gated
- Site readiness breakdown (4 dimensions)
- Full LLM response transcripts
- Platform citation analysis
- Gap analysis with benchmarks
- Action roadmap
- Methodology & data sources
30 min | Free | No commitment
Ready to Be
Recommended by AI?
Book a 30-minute call with us. We'll walk through your assessment, answer your questions, and map out exactly what it takes to get you cited by ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Book Discovery Call30 min | Free | No commitment
Site Readiness Score
2.0/10Technical
5/10- AI crawlers allowed in robots.txt (no explicit blocks for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot)
- HSTS enabled, secure HTTPS
- Hosted on Vercel with CDN
- Client-side React app (CSR) limits AI crawler content extraction
- No XML sitemap detected
- Minimal indexable HTML text—most content rendered client-side
Content
1/10- No blog section
- No FAQ pages
- No service detail pages (only homepage + auth pages)
- No case studies, guides, or educational content
- Homepage has meta description but minimal extractable body content due to CSR
Schema Markup
0/10- Zero JSON-LD structured data detected
- No Organization schema
- No Product/SoftwareApplication schema
- No FAQPage schema
- No WebSite schema
- Competitors: COCO has 0, Dear.AI has 1 (WebSite only)—opportunity to be first
Authority
2/10- Crunchbase profile exists (though confused with talent platform)
- LinkedIn company page + active founders (50+ followers, recent posts)
- Twitter account exists (@getgoodtake)
- Zero media coverage or news articles
- No review platforms (G2, Clutch, Capterra)
- No YouTube channel or video content
- No Reddit, Quora, or community forum presence
Full LLM Response Details
"What is GoodTake AI and what services do they offer?"
ChatGPT provided detailed response but CONFUSED two entities: (1) GoodTake talent/casting platform (goodtake.co) and (2) GoodTake AI image generation API (docs.goodtake.ai). Mentioned the creative studio aspect but cited wrong sources including Crunchbase profile for the talent platform. Brand confusion reduces effectiveness.
Perplexity correctly identified GoodTake AI as 'a creative studio platform designed for modern video and production workflows, powered by advanced AI models including Seedance, Seedream4, VEO 3, and Nano Banana.' Cited goodtake.ai and Singapore company registry. Brief but accurate.
"What are the best AI creative studios in Singapore?"
ChatGPT listed 11 AI creative studios in Singapore: Augmify, OrfeoAI, DWHQ, Salt Creatives, Artzee.sg, Awethentic Studio, Imaginative, Pencil Singapore, OneSky, PixelMusica, STYLELAB-AI. GoodTake was NOT mentioned at all. Dear.AI and COCO were also not mentioned—ChatGPT focused on different segment (agencies vs production tools).
Perplexity highlighted Dear.AI (#1), COCO Creative Studio (#2), and Banao Technologies (#3) as leading AI creative studios in Singapore. GoodTake was NOT mentioned. Perplexity emphasized these studios' 'specialized generative AI offerings for content production' and cited news coverage + company sites.
"Compare GoodTake AI vs COCO Creative Studio vs Dear.AI for AI video and image generation"
ChatGPT provided GENERIC comparison template with no specific information about any of the three companies. Web search was NOT used despite being requested. Response was entirely hypothetical: 'When comparing AI video and image generation tools like GoodTake AI, COCO Creative Studio, and Dear.AI...' but offered no actual data.
Perplexity stated: 'I don't have sufficient information in the search results to provide a detailed comparison.' Acknowledged GoodTake AI briefly as 'a creative studio powered by models like Seedance, Seedream4, VEO 3, and Nano Banana' but had zero data on COCO or Dear.AI for comparison purposes. Only citation: goodtake.ai homepage.
Gap Analysis
Side-by-side comparison: GoodTake AI vs COCO Creative Studio (leading competitor in Singapore).
Recommended Actions
Create FAQ page with schema
Write 8-10 FAQ pairs answering: What is GoodTake AI? Which AI models do you use? What's the difference between Seedance/VEO/Nano Banana? Pricing model? Use cases? Implement FAQPage schema. 1-2 day effort, immediate SEO + AEO signal.
Implement Organization schema
Add Organization JSON-LD to homepage: name, url, logo, description, sameAs (LinkedIn, Twitter), contactPoint. Knowledge Graph eligibility. 1 hour effort.
Fix CSR → SSR for homepage
Next.js already supports SSR—enable for key pages so AI crawlers see actual content, not framework shell. Critical for indexability.
Create 3 service pages
Dedicated pages for: (1) AI Video Generation, (2) AI Image Generation, (3) Production Workflows. Each with model details, use cases, examples. Use Product schema.
Launch blog with 5 initial posts
Target: 'How to use [AI model] for [creative task]', 'Seedance vs VEO 3 comparison', 'AI production workflow guide'. Schema markup on each. Weekly publishing cadence.
PR campaign: Singapore tech media
Pitch to Tech in Asia, e27, Vulcan Post. Angle: 'Singapore AI studio launches with VEO 3, Nano Banana for local brands'. Goal: 2-3 articles for LLM citations.
ProductHunt launch
Launch on ProductHunt with demo video, use cases, founder story. Target: top 5 product of the day. Creates Reddit/HN discussion + review platform presence.
Create YouTube channel
5-10 demo videos: model comparisons, before/after examples, tutorial walkthroughs. YouTube is universal LLM citation source. Embed videos on site.
Resolve brand confusion
Clarify distinction from goodtake.co (talent platform). Consider: (1) Distinct messaging on site, (2) Schema disambiguatingDescription, (3) Separate social profiles.
Build case study library
Document 5-10 client projects with before/after, workflow, results. Schema: CreativeWork. Creates citable content + portfolio proof.
Founder thought leadership program
Gleb + Mila: (1) LinkedIn articles (2/month), (2) Guest posts on AI/production blogs, (3) Conference talks (AI Singapore, Tech in Asia events). Build external authority.
Community presence strategy
Active participation in: r/Singapore, r/ArtificialIntelligence, r/MediaProduction. Share insights, answer questions, showcase work. Authentic, not spammy.
Review platform strategy
If B2B: claim G2/Clutch profiles, solicit client reviews. If prosumer: consider alternative platforms. Creates third-party validation.
Methodology
Audit Parameters
| Skill Version | AEO Audit v2.0 |
| Target Market | Singapore |
| Competitors Analyzed | Dear.AI / CreativesAtWork, COCO Creative Studio |
| LLM Engines | ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Perplexity (Sonar Pro) |
| Assessment Date | February 14, 2026 |
| Scoring Model | Site Readiness + LLM Visibility (weighted composite) |
Data Sources
- Organic keyword rankings and traffic estimates for Singapore market
- SERP feature analysis (AI Overviews, featured snippets, People Also Ask)
- Live LLM queries across ChatGPT and Perplexity
- On-page content analysis (word count, structure, schema markup)
- Backlink profile and domain authority metrics
- Third-party platform and directory presence scan
- Technical site audit (SSL, mobile responsiveness, page speed)
- Competitor benchmarking across all dimensions
Prepared by Novastacks AI | February 14, 2026 | novastacks-ai.com